http://tattersdill.litscimed.org/2009/12/20/christmas-review/ A blog about Science Fiction, the late-Victorian/Edwardian Periodical Press, and issues arising from both. Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:44:08 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://tattersdill.litscimed.org/2009/12/20/christmas-review/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Will Tattersdill Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:00:53 +0000 http://tattersdill.litscimed.org/?p=12#comment-7 Hey Sharon - I don't think it's house style alone that blurs these differences, but it certainly contributes. And yes, from everything I've seen so far it looks like editors were very active indeed on content, perhaps because of their large numbers of rivals... Hey Sharon – I don’t think it’s house style alone that blurs these differences, but it certainly contributes. And yes, from everything I’ve seen so far it looks like editors were very active indeed on content, perhaps because of their large numbers of rivals…

]]> http://tattersdill.litscimed.org/2009/12/20/christmas-review/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Sharon Ruston Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:55:44 +0000 http://tattersdill.litscimed.org/?p=12#comment-6 Gosh, lots to think about here then, but you seem ready for the task! I'm amused by the idea of 'the most highly-developed woman', which perhaps does sound a little like sf... It's interesting to hear that house style etc blurs generic differences between, say westerns and sf. Did the editor of periodicals like The Strand and Idler have a say in the content of stories they ran too? Gosh, lots to think about here then, but you seem ready for the task! I’m amused by the idea of ‘the most highly-developed woman’, which perhaps does sound a little like sf… It’s interesting to hear that house style etc blurs generic differences between, say westerns and sf. Did the editor of periodicals like The Strand and Idler have a say in the content of stories they ran too?

]]>