Archive for the ‘Research Updates’ Category

A blog post without ‘Hawarden’ in the title. Oh, wait-

Monday, January 11th, 2010

It seems that I just can’t get enough of Interdisciplinary Skills courses these days! Tomorrow I begin attending the weekly ‘Exploring Disciplines‘ frolic as part of the KCL researcher development programme (part of what someone somewhere thought it would be a good idea to call ‘SkillsForge’). And today I’ve been doing the reading. Here’s a paragraph from I. A. Richards’s 1955 Speculative Instruments which I’m pretty sure former Hawarden residents will find stimulating. That’s right, 1955! Someone was writing a treatise for interdisciplinary studies four years before the two cultures! Here’s what he said:

If the possibilities to be realized are such and such, then a certain phrasing will be best. But note well the if here. Linguistic science can and will help us to see which phrasings will do what, but it cannot, as science, settle which possibilities are to be realized. As students of the humanities, we know this to be a deeper matter than any science, as yet, has explored; a matter of what man is and should be, of what his world is and should be, of what the God he should worship and obey is and should be. All this, the Scientist – linguistic or other – will admit to be beyond his purview as a Scientist. What is done and what can be done he can inquire into, but what should be done is not within his province. [all emphases original]

I pass on without any comment at all except to say that the last sentence of this same chapter is “[b]ut there is already in these Notes more than Literary Criticism itself may be expected to agree upon, let alone other Studies”. Oh, it’s endless.

Christmas Review

Sunday, December 20th, 2009

I know what you’re asking – the question on the tip of your tongue, which you dare not speak. “Was there any decent Science Fiction published in The Idler between 1892 and 1895?”

Well, you’ve come to the right place. I’ve read every issue so far and the answer is – well, no. Not really. There’s lots of miasmic, vague, heading-in-that-direction sort of stuff but only about four outright occurances of something I’d consider anthologising, and even then it’s mostly been social fantasy. No spaceships. No aliens. No robots.

Not yet, anyway. 1895, the year I’ve just got to, is a bit of a watershed year for sf, because it’s the year H. G. Wells kicks things up a notch with the publication of The Time Machine. He proceeds to churn out genre classics (quite literally) at the rate of one a year, peaking in 1898 with The War of the Worlds, whose shadow most present-day sf still lives under.

My suspicion, yet to be verified, is that the months following the serial publication of Wells’s debut in ‘95 will see an acceleration in the appearance of more traditionally-definable sf in the other periodicals, as editors realise that there’s money in this kind of writing.

It may well not be the case, however – if you immerse yourself in genre writing from the 1890s, one of the first things you’ll notice is that westerns, society tales, romances, detective stories, interviews and reviews are all bound together by their common vehicle of transmission – by the house style and editorial principles of the journal in which they are bound together. Science Fiction is just part of this huge milieu, and although Wells plays an important role in crystallising it, he by no means invents it.

In any case, The Idler is likely to lag behind the trends set by the bigger periodicals – magazines like The Strand, which I’ll be coming to later on in my research. As its title suggests, The Idler is edited in a slightly more idiosyncratic manner than its rivals. Its chiefs seem to me likely to put their own aesthetic judgments ahead of whatever the market is doing when Wells’s work starts taking off.

I wish I could show you some of my Idler photocopies without the Bodleian firing me into the sun. As a cop-out, I quote from their special ‘Advanced Woman’ number (not a sci-fi Advanced Woman, I hasten to add). This passage is written by Mary L. Prendred under the heading ‘How to Court the Advanced Woman’:

In the first place, I submit that the ‘Advanced Woman’ [...] does not so much require to be courted as convinced. The word ‘court’, I take it, signifies to solicit, cajole, persuade, or – as a slang term defines it – canoodle, and the so-called ‘New’ woman is not to be canoodled. Either she falls in love or she doesn’t; and if she doesn’t, it is not necessarily due to any failure of method on the part of the man who wants to marry her. He may, at all events, be sure that she is quite ready to wed the one who can command her respect, attract her senses, and assure her of his right to her, whether he be intellectually her superior, equal or inferior. For the most highly-developed woman is not all brains, and there are to be found in the average man diverse other qualities as compelling and worthy of worship as intellectuality. Moreover, there ought to be less difficulty about coming to an understanding with an ‘Advanced Woman’ than with a  traditional one. The latter is hemmed in by pretences and the fear of what outsiders may say or think. The former should be free from such considerations, and, when a man has satisfied her that he is desirable, should be prepared to meet him with the frankest encouragement. Coyness and modesty are not confused in the mind of the ‘Advanced Woman’.

Nothing to do with Science Fiction at all, of course – but we do have the upturning of old values, and, by inference, the idea of a new and consciously created social order. Ally this to the didactic tone of the piece and its situation in a magazine alongside westerns and detective stories and you get a slightly different picture. Even if sf has yet to make its grand entrance, the ground is very well prepared for it.*

So who knows? I’m going in to the post-Time Machine years with as few preconceptions as possible, and only a thorough and extended reading of as many issues as I can get my hands on will give us the answer. Will sf explode onto the scene after Wells, or will it continue the slow emergence I have already detected? Stay tuned…

* This is not to suggest that all sf emodies the progressive values of Miss Prendred. Indeed, it arguably spends the twentieth century failing in this supposed goal so effectively that the majority of men and women currently ‘courting’ could do far worse than examine closely the passage I have quoted…
Very few genres disempower women as much as sf will go on to do in the 1960s. Equally, however, it is difficult for me to read Prendred’s words without thinking of the aspirational essays which Wells would go on to write in the 1900s. My main point is that sf’s arrival is very far from divorced from its cultural and material context, however fantastical its subject-matter. These are all issues which require much more time spent on them, and I shall spend it.

In the first place, I submit that the 'Advanced Woman' [...] does not
so much require to be courted as convinced. The word 'court', I take it,
signifies to solicit, cajole, persuade, or - as a slang term defines it
- canoodle, and the so-called 'New' woman is not to be canoodled. Either
she falls in love or she doesn't; and if she doesn't, it is not
necessarily due to any failure of method on the part of the man who
wants to marry her. He may, at all events, be sure that she is quite
ready to wed the one who can command her respect, attract her senses,
and assure her of his right to her, whether he be intellectually her
superior, equal or inferior. For the most highly-developed woman is not
all brains, and there are to be found in the average man diverse other
qualities as compelling and worthy of worship as intellectuality.
Moreover, there ought to be less difficulty about coming to an
understanding with an 'Advanced Woman' than with a traditional one. The
latter is hemmed in by pretences and the fear of what outsiders may say
or think. The former should be free from such considerations, and, when
a man has satisfied her that he is desirable, should be prepared to meet
him with the frankest encouragement. Coyness and modesty are not
confused in the mind of the 'Advanced Woman'.

Gentlemen: Good morrow

Sunday, November 29th, 2009

I’ve been getting e-mails from the LitSciMed coalition (if I may call them that) for a while now and it seems to me that everything they’re doing is made of excellence, so here I am starting a blog and following them on twitter and doing all sorts of other digital things. I hope this will provide a welcome distraction from the task of reading every periodical published between 1890 and 1912, whilst giving me the same self-satisfaction that actual work does.

Those who have stumbled here by accident, I suppose I had better explain. My research interest is in the Science Fiction published in monthlies between the years named above, or thereabouts. Whilst I am interested in the history of sf during this time (it is underreasearched), this project is not ‘about’ sf; rather, it sees it as a useful fracture point between literature, culture and science. My hope is that interrogating this threshold a little will result in some exciting conclusions about how these areas bleed into each other, and the consequences that bleed has for us.

I’m about two months into this project, which will hopefully become a PhD thesis at some point along the way. I’m currently reading The Idler, a truly excellent magazine co-edited by Jerome K. Jerome (he of Three Men in a Boat), and I have already found a few bona fide Sci-Fi stories which I don’t believe have been reprinted since. The first one I found, published in July 1892, is ‘The Memory Clearing House’ by I. Zangwill, a comic tale which in many ways anticipates that film Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) with Jim Carrey. Since finding Zangwill’s story is the only thing I’ve done so far which has given me that famous Warm Research Glow (WRG), I am naming this blog after it. It’s also an appropriate title because my own memory is terrible, and I will probably instantly forget anything I find which isn’t written down here.

I haven’t just been on The Idler: I’m also trying to accumulate a critical perspective by reading works on Periodicals (Mussell, Brake, Secord), Science and Society (Latour, Serres, Ben Goldacre), the History of Science (Richard Holmes) and Science Fiction (Moskowitz, Aldiss, Suvin). My immediate project is reviewing two books on popular science in the twentieth century for the journal Media History. I study at KCL under the supervision of Mark Turner. My favourite food is toad in the hole.

It’s possible, as I’ve remarked elsewhere, that all this is leading up to something.